The other side of the Fur Story: "The Luxurious Necessity?"

Besides skinny models, one of the most popularly criticized habit of fashion is the use of animal furs. But there's always two sides to every story - even the Fur Story. The Bag Lady and Catwalk Queen readers enthusiastically gave thumbs up to Janice Dickinson, despite her notoriously rambunctious personality, for her "I'd Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur" PETA naked parade. I don't know many folks out there who actively support animal cruelty (it's usually just general apathy or a lack of awareness) but I think the position of the Fur Council of Canada warrants some attention in that regard.
According to the FCoC, the fur trade is a responsible industry based on the "sustainable use of renewable natural resources" - in other words, they do not hunt animals to extinction.
The fur trade adds to the economy, puts food and income on the table for many Canadian families, and supports the lifestyle of aboriginal people of the land. Redeemable, believeable qualities of the one fashion-world staple that is constantly under criticism?
*** Disclaimer: Please note that these views do not neccessarily represent the overall opinions held by the writers of Catwalk Queen.***
Want to watch Aigua Fashion TV? Click here for the latest videos
Came straight to this page? Visit www.catwalkqueen.tv for loads more stories!













Perhaps they do not hunt animals to extinction - but is life really worth living in a small cage? I find their arguments ridiculous, if they're doing the animals such a great favor, how about stuffing your own kid or sister into a small cage, abuse her all her life, kill her in the most horrendous way and then eat her and use her skin as a coat...??? Let's not forget that human beings are animals too - of the most selfish kind....
Posted by: Henriette | August 31, 2007 10:01 AM