woman of the year??? for what?? even from a fashion/celeb maagzine that's outrageous. It really sickens me that you can be called Woman of the Year in ANY poll for simply being an anorexic eeejit with a famous husband and a token fashion line.

Posted by: Helen | June 6, 2007 2:14 PM

erm she looks like a comple hooker!!! the white jacket and gloves r awful and dnt evn match eachother. they look more like knickers than hot pants! woman of the year award seems silly 2 me cos she hasnt actually done anything except bring out a perfume and get stupidly skinny!

Posted by: abbey | June 6, 2007 2:28 PM

Exactly what I said seeing her picture in today's papers - she looks like a street hooker in that outfit! Lagerfeld must have played an elaborate joke on her, there is no way he genuinely dressed her this way unless he is losing it, which is also possible considering the sort of interviews he has been giving in the last couple of years. Perhaps Karl is too big for his own head these days?

Posted by: arelya | June 6, 2007 5:35 PM

She does look bloody awful just lately. And as for woman of the year well..........
I work in a hospital alongside a great many women who would be far more deserving of the title. She is only famous for being skinny and married to a footballer, without DB we would be no more aware of her than we are of the other Spice girls. I'm afraid i can't stand the woman and i will no longer be buying glamour magazine.

Posted by: Sarah | June 6, 2007 7:16 PM

Leather gloves in June? Another night out for the YSL shoes? She looks like she's auditioning for the Pussy Cat Dolls. This woman's clothes scream desperation.

Posted by: vicky | June 6, 2007 8:09 PM

I think the outfit is rather daring and matches the way she portrays herself to the media. But for receiving the (undeserved) award, she should've worn something else more tasteful. In fact, the perfect place for this outfit would've been the MTV Movie Awards.

Posted by: Ada | June 6, 2007 9:51 PM

I'm really tired of people always saying bad stuff about VB, yes she's tacky,but why is she always on cover of magazines, if the only purpose is always to say negative stuff. It's becoming the english national sport to say in how many way the woman is horrible, for me it's already turning into a rather snobbish thing to do. I really don't care about her, she as uninteresting as the sexual life of the potato, but there is lot of people out there that seem to care what she's doing, so I wish mags stoped pretending that they are very "cool" and if they use her as a selling point at least should be grateful that she exists.
I Never bought Glamour magazine in my life, but now maybe I wil,l at least I know they are not hypocrites.

End of rant

Posted by: doris | June 7, 2007 12:07 AM

As most of the other people who commented on this post seem unable to read, I will point this out for them - THE POLL WAS VOTED FOR BY GLAMOUR READERS. If you're going to blame someone for a 'pointless' celebrity winning the poll, point the finger at them, not her. There must be plenty of people out there who actually wanted to vote for her. And yes, I too think there are thousands of ordinary women in the UK more deserving of the award, but come on - this is a fashion/celeb magazine's awards ceremony, what do you expect? Personally I think Teri Hatcher winning Writer of the Year is far more ridiculous! And as for Victoria's outfit, she looks stunning and her body is incredible. Anyone who says otherwise is clearly saying it out of jealousy. We'd all dress like that if we looked like her.

Posted by: Katie | June 7, 2007 3:26 PM

Katie,

I believe I look better than her, still I would most certainly not dress like her. It is a tasteless and desperate outfit. As for jealousy... I feel terribly sorry for this poor woman who cannot find anything she is really good at. (Don't even say "fashion") She looks very unhealthy at the moment, too thin. Just because someone is on the cover of the magazine that does not mean they are automaticly more beautiful. She is not famous for her beauty, she is famous for being in Spice Girls and David. LA is a perfect place for her, I believe she will be very happy there and will finally come into her own. Her dress sense, however, is a different story altogether.

Posted by: arelya | June 7, 2007 4:55 PM

I think it's dreadful even in fashion terms - in the fashion world there are plenty more deserving women, such as models, fashion designers etc. Kate Moss or even Jordan would have well deserved 'entrepreneur of the year' as they have actually been innovative. And no i wouldnt dress like her, i think her style is terrible. And personally, i think women of her size - or women of Beth Ditto's - should be censored, given the effect they have on women's health when they are held up as admirable. For god's sake the woman doesnt have periods. That's hardly healthy.

Posted by: Helen | June 7, 2007 7:23 PM

Haha, I agree with Katie, why did Teri Hatcher win writer of the year? For some semi autobiographical novel she probably has her assistant write? Who knows how true these poll results are, after all certain celebrities have some powerful and pushy PR people.

P.S. I love hearing all your thoughts about Posh's outfit... as intriguing as it is, it's too outrageous and accentuates things that are either fake (her boobs) or unnecessary (her butt).

Posted by: Helen | June 8, 2007 12:22 PM

When did going to an award ceremony (even when undeserved) mean dressing like a SKANK!! Did something terrible happen to the gown she was supposed to wear so she said screw it and wore her underwear.

Seriously, it just exactly what she is. Does the UK have a term for "trailer trash"? 'Cause that is what we will be calling her here in the US very soon!

Posted by: Alex | June 9, 2007 2:04 AM

"Kate Moss or even Jordan would have well deserved 'entrepreneur of the year' as they have actually been innovative"
Er, WTF?! Kate Moss 'designed' a range for Topshop which was actually made up of copies of items by other designers that she's worn in the past. And took drugs (great example to set there, especially since she's a mother). That's it. And the walking car crash that is Jordan? What the hell has she done exactly? Been repulsive for yet another year? I've never read a more ridiculous comment in my life.
"For god's sake the woman doesnt have periods"
How exactly do you know this? Are you a personal friend of hers? If not then I doubt you are qualified to make such a comment. Doubtless some trashy magazine will have made this claim, but remarkably enough, that doesn't mean it's actually true. And if she 'doesn't have periods' then how is it that she's magically managed to get pregnant 3 times?

Posted by: Jovy | June 9, 2007 2:58 PM