Well, she's been warned. If someone does take her out, her friends and family cannot deny that it was HER choice.

Posted by: daffg | May 11, 2007 8:08 PM

Seriously i find anyone who opposes to fur are absolute tools. Unless all they buy is fair trade organic enviromentally friendly from a reliable and local source their "fur arguement" is an absolute load of b****cks compare to everything else in the world today.

Posted by: jane | May 11, 2007 10:42 PM

It isn't beside the point at all, to me. My point is that the dimwit J lo knows that some very dangerous people are becoming very, very pissed off with her. She knows this. If she has been warned, and she doesn't heed these warnings, then tough luck if she gets her head smashed in.

Now, I wouldn't want this to happen to her, no way. I don't particularly care about the airhead. I don't think she's that important and I don't think she should be isolated as a target.

Victims aren't to blame. But J Lo would have courted her own destruction, through persisting in her barbarous activities, even after receiving warning. That was the case with the politician in Holland. He was warned, constantly and consistently, to stop pushing for fur farms. Is it his fault he was assasinated? probably not. Could he have prevented it? Certainly.

If anything was to happen to Jo lo, she wouldn't be to 'blame for it'. Nonetheless, she would have been able to prevent it. That she would, in that case, have chosen a pointless fashion statment - which she hardly needs to make, with her wealth and opportunity - over her life, just shows how meaningless her meaningless life was to her too.

I would have very little sympathy for her. Just as I have little sympathy with drunks who start fights and end up broken and busted in the gutter.

Posted by: daffg | May 12, 2007 6:54 PM

In case I'm misunderstood, I should point out that I regard Jo Lo as small fry.

Animal activists should leave her alone - the fur industry ins't going to rise and fall on whether a braindead s**head like JLo wraps herself in animal corpses.

Jo Lo is mostly a propaganda tool for big business AR groups like PETA (who seek scoops: "we made celeb X give up fur!"). Genuine animal activists should concern themselves with grassroots compaigns, educting consumers, not following Peta's agenda and chasing after 'scoops' that will give them publicity in celeb mags but not make a jolt of differebce for animals.

Nonetheless, I stand by my statment: if she was to be knocked off, I wouldn't lost a moments sleep. she's trash of the worst sort.

Posted by: daffg | May 12, 2007 7:03 PM

Cool site. Thank you:-)

Posted by: low price furniture | May 17, 2007 4:55 PM

Nice site. Thank you!

Posted by: the high cost of low pri | May 17, 2007 7:01 PM

Cool site. Thanks.

Posted by: low yatt price | May 17, 2007 8:51 PM