free web hit counter
Browse by:
Get daily news round-up

Time Magazine's List of Top Ten Fashion Crazes A Load Of Bollocks?

Fashion_1

Time magazine have been busy putting together a list of the top ten best of virtually everything which existed in 2006 (including the top ten video games, which WiiWii just looked at), but I thought the fashion list was worth a mention here at Catwalk Queen, simply for its laugh factor. Now, given that Time is an American publication, we presume the fashions must be American-centric as well, as us British Catwalk Queen ladies have been gossiping over the list and barely agree with any of the items on there. Take a look under the jump for the full top 10 run-down, and our thoughts on their selections. Stay tuned for our list tomorrow!

1.) The miniskirt and minidress - we heartily agree! Our legs are all covered in goosebumps as we speak!

2.) Skinny jeans - definitely a hit trend, but we can't help but think it was a trend which caught on long before 2006 - ie, 2004 perhaps?

3.) Platform boots - platforms are a huge trend, however we haven't seen anyone sporting the Balenciaga boots given as Time's example. Is this perhaps a fashion trend limited purely to Vogue's offices in Manhattan? Bah to broken ankles, give us flats anyday.

4.) Wide belts - again, a trend we thought saw the light of day in 05, not 06, Time dahhlings. It was a huge trend back then, admittedly...

5.) Ballet flats - hate to sound like a broken Abba record, but again, everyone was wearing them back in 2004, heck, even my trend-blind mother. And I still can't seem to scrape them off my super-glued-up feet.

6.) Tunics - finally, a trend which did surface in 2006, however it wasn't that huge this side of the pond, oh no, we were favouring little 60s minidresses and sweater jumpers as opposed to shapeless, pregnant-inducing tunics.

7.) Brogue shoes - we've seen them in Vogue, on the catwalks, even on Shoewawa, but has anyone actually seen one in the wild, stuck to someone's foot? Or does anyone actually own a pair?! Case in point.

8.) Thom Browne - apparently this chap is a hipster-god, who men like Russell Brand owe their looks to, as he created the skinny trousers and oops-this-suit-is-three-sizes-too-small style. Well, we are exclusively a womanswear blog, don't hold it against us for not knowing much about this designer!

9.) Thomas Wylde -  we do love their bags on The Bag Lady, and boots on Shoewawa, but there's no way they can be credited with starting the skull-and-crossbones scarves phase! Tsk, do they not read Catwalk Queen, we've mentioned Alexander McQueen's scarves a kazillion times!

10.) Black nail polish - Kiss & Makeup readers voted 'Yay' on Chanel's black nail polish, which was a 2006 fashion buzz-item for many months, but does it really deserve a mention on such a prestigious list? We vote no, and sorely because it's not a huge fashion trend over here, unless you're an A-lister. Or Cyberdog of Camden-dweller.

Related Posts Widget for Blogs by LinkWithin

Want to watch Aigua Fashion TV? Click here for the latest videos

Came straight to this page? Visit www.catwalkqueen.tv for loads more stories!

Comments

I think I'll hit this point by point. :D

- Skinny jeans: US-side at least seemed to only hit big this year. Maybe it was around circa 2004, but it certainly wasn't a BIG trend until this year. Then again, I've only been a year and a half in New York, and I lived in Wisconsin before that, where comfort is key. I personally won't touch skinnies with a 10 foot pole, but my thin little sister looks great in them.

- Tunics were, far and away, easier to find and more popular than 60s minidresses. In fact, I bought a charcoal one at Target that made me look a little bit like a hip mommy-to-be. And thus it was not worn a whole lot.

- Brogue detailing has been more popular than straight up brogue shoes. I've seen lots of pumps and Mary Janes with the details, but not the full-on man shoe look so much.

Posted by: Amanda | January 3, 2007 6:39 PM

not big in 2004. big in 2005 (if you had the $).

Posted by: linds | January 3, 2007 9:37 PM

Are the US always a few years behind? Despite the Glamazons in US Vogue and the LA dahlings there appears to be no-one doing decent modern fashion. They are always a few years behind and this list proves it! I can't wait for CQ's tomorrow x

Posted by: Juji | January 3, 2007 11:15 PM

Personally, I think the article should have been called 'Celebrity Trends of 2006'. Most (if not all) of these so called trends seem to be the ones that occurred within the celebrity microcosm last year. And I say that as the celeb writer an' all ;););)

But yes - the UK has always been a bit different to the rest of the world. Being back in Oz, I'm seeing more American-related trends here than the more unusual ones you see in the UK.

Posted by: Erin Le Clerc | January 3, 2007 11:43 PM

Up here in Eastern Canada (I go to school in Montreal, the most fashion-forward city in Canada, but spend my summers in Ottawa), it really seems as though the skinny jean trend only caught on in 2006. 60's minidresses have only recently (in the past few months, with the groundswell in the past month or so) hit our budget-friendly clothing retailers. Even so, some of the offerings still seem to struggle with the concept of "mini". I know it's cold up here, but really!

One thing I did see entirely too much of this year was houndstooth.

Posted by: Lulu J. | January 4, 2007 2:12 AM

Like Lulu, I'm up in the great white North and I can vouch that trends hit North America quite a bit after their run in the UK. I was in the UK a few years (well, many many years) ago when cowboy boots struck big and that only caught on in Canada two years later.

As such, most of Time's list is extremely relevant to North America. As for the black nail polish, I know that it is still huge in Toronto and on weeks and weeks backorder in the stores. Every other supposedly fashion forward girl here sports the black nails.

And not to be nitpicky but the list was what was big in 2006, right? Not what was introduced in 2006? So regardless of when they hit the streets, they are addressing trends that were largely seen in the masses this past year. As such, I would agree with ballet flats, and wide belts.

CQ, just a reminder that things are a bit different "across the pond" as you would say!

Posted by: Aliya | January 5, 2007 5:24 PM

Brogue-detailed definitely, I own a couple of pairs (heeled) and love them!

Posted by: Elizabeth | January 8, 2007 12:33 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.